AMD Radeon 630 vs NVIDIA Quadro P500
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 630 and NVIDIA Quadro P500 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 630
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 1834.4x more texture fill rate: 38.98 GTexel/s vs 21.25 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 512 vs 256
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3467 vs 2622
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3467 vs 2622
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3720 vs 3685
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3720 vs 3685
- Around 57% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9651 vs 6163
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 5 January 2018 |
Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s vs 21.25 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 vs 256 |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3467 vs 2622 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3467 vs 2622 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 vs 3685 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 vs 3685 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 3353 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9651 vs 6163 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P500
- Around 34% higher core clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 1082 MHz
- Around 25% higher boost clock speed: 1519 MHz vs 1218 MHz
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 2.9x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective)
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 241 vs 223
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1637 vs 1272
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1455 MHz vs 1082 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1519 MHz vs 1218 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 241 vs 223 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1637 vs 1272 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P500
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 630 | NVIDIA Quadro P500 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3467 | 2622 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3467 | 2622 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 3685 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 3685 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 3353 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9651 | 6163 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 223 | 241 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1272 | 1637 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 630 | NVIDIA Quadro P500 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Polaris 23 | GP108 |
Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 5 January 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 756 | 797 |
Type | Mobile workstation | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1218 MHz | 1519 MHz |
Compute units | 8 | |
Core clock speed | 1082 MHz | 1455 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 77.95 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 512 | 256 |
Pixel fill rate | 19.49 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s | 21.25 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 30 Watt |
Transistor count | 2200 million | 1,800 million |
Floating-point performance | 679.9 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 3x mini-DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 5.7 inches (145 mm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Width | Dual-slot | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12_1 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | 32.1 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) | 5012 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
Multi Monitor |