AMD Radeon E6465 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20m

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon E6465 and NVIDIA Tesla K20m videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E6465

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
  • 9x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 225 Watt
  • Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 354 vs 210
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 29 September 2015 vs 5 January 2013
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 25 Watt vs 225 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 354 vs 210

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K20m

  • Around 18% higher core clock speed: 706 MHz vs 600 MHz
  • 30.6x more texture fill rate: 146.8 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s
  • 15.6x more pipelines: 2496 vs 160
  • 18.4x better floating-point performance: 3,524 gflops vs 192.0 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • 2.5x more maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 2 GB
  • Around 63% higher memory clock speed: 5200 MHz vs 3200 MHz
  • 19.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4432 vs 231
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 706 MHz vs 600 MHz
Texture fill rate 146.8 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s
Pipelines 2496 vs 160
Floating-point performance 3,524 gflops vs 192.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Maximum memory size 5 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed 5200 MHz vs 3200 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 4432 vs 231

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon E6465
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K20m

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
354
210
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
231
4432
Name AMD Radeon E6465 NVIDIA Tesla K20m
PassMark - G2D Mark 354 210
PassMark - G3D Mark 231 4432
Geekbench - OpenCL 14510
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 54.89
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1414.755
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 5.303
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 83.807
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 250.291
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 8319
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 7337
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 10873
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 8319
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 7337
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 10873

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon E6465 NVIDIA Tesla K20m

Essentials

Architecture TeraScale 2 Kepler
Code name Caicos GK110
Launch date 29 September 2015 5 January 2013
Place in performance rating 441 407
Type Desktop Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $3,199

Technical info

Core clock speed 600 MHz 706 MHz
Floating-point performance 192.0 gflops 3,524 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 160 2496
Texture fill rate 4.8 GTexel / s 146.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 25 Watt 225 Watt
Transistor count 370 million 7,080 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Length 267 mm

API support

DirectX 11.2 (11_0) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.4 4.6

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 5 GB
Memory bandwidth 25.6 GB / s 208.0 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 320 Bit
Memory clock speed 3200 MHz 5200 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5