AMD Radeon E8870 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20m
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon E8870 and NVIDIA Tesla K20m videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E8870
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 42% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 706 MHz
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Around 15% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 5200 MHz
- 3.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 708 vs 210
- Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 18191 vs 10873
- Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 18191 vs 10873
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 29 September 2015 vs 5 January 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 706 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 5200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 708 vs 210 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 18191 vs 10873 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 18191 vs 10873 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K20m
- 3.1x more texture fill rate: 146.8 GTexel / s vs 48 GTexel / s
- 3.3x more pipelines: 2496 vs 768
- 2.3x better floating-point performance: 3,524 gflops vs 1,536 gflops
- Around 25% higher maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4432 vs 3368
- Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 54.89 vs 36.948
- Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1414.755 vs 874.689
- 4.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.303 vs 1.11
- Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8319 vs 4620
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7337 vs 5030
- Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8319 vs 4620
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7337 vs 5030
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 146.8 GTexel / s vs 48 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2496 vs 768 |
Floating-point performance | 3,524 gflops vs 1,536 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 5 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4432 vs 3368 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 54.89 vs 36.948 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1414.755 vs 874.689 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.303 vs 1.11 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8319 vs 4620 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7337 vs 5030 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8319 vs 4620 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7337 vs 5030 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon E8870
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K20m
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon E8870 | NVIDIA Tesla K20m |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3368 | 4432 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 708 | 210 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.948 | 54.89 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 874.689 | 1414.755 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.11 | 5.303 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4620 | 8319 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5030 | 7337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 18191 | 10873 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4620 | 8319 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5030 | 7337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 18191 | 10873 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14510 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 83.807 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 250.291 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon E8870 | NVIDIA Tesla K20m | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Saturn | GK110 |
Launch date | 29 September 2015 | 5 January 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 340 | 407 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $3,199 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 706 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,536 gflops | 3,524 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 2496 |
Texture fill rate | 48 GTexel / s | 146.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 7,080 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 5 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB / s | 208.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 320 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 5200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |