AMD Radeon E8950 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon E8950 and NVIDIA Quadro K5200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E8950
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 10% higher core clock speed: 735 MHz vs 667 MHz
- Around 30% higher boost clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 771 MHz
- Around 15% better floating-point performance: 4,096 gflops vs 3,553 gflops
- Around 58% lower typical power consumption: 95 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 66.837 vs 47.147
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1369.722 vs 1278.433
- Around 66% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.633 vs 3.996
- Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 65.836 vs 50.08
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 326.391 vs 115.307
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 29 September 2015 vs 22 July 2014 |
Core clock speed | 735 MHz vs 667 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 771 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 4,096 gflops vs 3,553 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 66.837 vs 47.147 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1369.722 vs 1278.433 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.633 vs 3.996 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.836 vs 50.08 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 326.391 vs 115.307 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K5200
- Around 16% higher texture fill rate: 148.0 GTexel / s vs 128.0 GTexel / s
- Around 13% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 2048
Texture fill rate | 148.0 GTexel / s vs 128.0 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 2048 |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 6000 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon E8950
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K5200
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon E8950 | NVIDIA Quadro K5200 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 66.837 | 47.147 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1369.722 | 1278.433 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.633 | 3.996 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.836 | 50.08 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 326.391 | 115.307 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6030 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 531 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18323 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5946 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5946 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon E8950 | NVIDIA Quadro K5200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Amethyst | GK110B |
Launch date | 29 September 2015 | 22 July 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 732 | 534 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,699.74 | |
Price now | $523.66 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 14.51 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | 771 MHz |
Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 667 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 4,096 gflops | 3,553 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 2304 |
Texture fill rate | 128.0 GTexel / s | 148.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 7,080 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB / s | 192.3 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 6008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |