AMD Radeon E9171 MCM vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon E9171 MCM and Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E9171 MCM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 3.7x more core clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 22% higher boost clock speed: 1219 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 7.1x more pipelines: 512 vs 72
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 924.953 vs 450.087
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 52.632 vs 25.346
- Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 97.705 vs 67.077
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 October 2017 vs 1 September 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1124 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1219 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Pipelines | 512 vs 72 |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 924.953 vs 450.087 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.632 vs 25.346 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 97.705 vs 67.077 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 40 Watt
- 16x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 80% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 49.11 vs 27.321
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.059 vs 2.499
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 40 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.11 vs 27.321 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.059 vs 2.499 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon E9171 MCM
GPU 2: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon E9171 MCM | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.321 | 49.11 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 924.953 | 450.087 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.499 | 3.059 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.632 | 25.346 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 97.705 | 67.077 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1978 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 361 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8750 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2846 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1668 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2846 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1668 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon E9171 MCM | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Generation 9.0 |
| Code name | Lexa | Skylake GT4e |
| Launch date | 3 October 2017 | 1 September 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 1187 | 993 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1219 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1124 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,248 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 72 |
| Texture fill rate | 39.01 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,200 million | 189 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 64 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon E9171 MCM with others
AMDRadeon E9171 MCM vs
ATIRadeon IGP 350M
AMDRadeon E9171 MCM vs
ATIRadeon 9200 PRO
AMDRadeon E9171 MCM vs
AMDRadeon R7 M350
AMDRadeon E9171 MCM vs
IntelHD Graphics P530
AMDRadeon E9171 MCM vs
AMDRadeon R7 M520
AMDRadeon E9171 MCM vs
IntelUHD Graphics
