AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe and Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.

AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
3.6x more core clock speed: 1090 MHz vs 300 MHz
Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1150 MHz
Around 4% higher texture fill rate: 57.6 GTexel / s vs 55.2 GTexel / s
18.7x more pipelines: 896 vs 48
2.4x better floating-point performance: 2,150 gflops vs 883.2 gflops
2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5269 vs 2475
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2344 vs 958
Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 2304
2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5269 vs 2475
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2344 vs 958
Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 2304

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 September 2016 vs 5 September 2014
Core clock speed	1090 MHz vs 300 MHz
Boost clock speed	1200 MHz vs 1150 MHz
Texture fill rate	57.6 GTexel / s vs 55.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines	896 vs 48
Floating-point performance	2,150 gflops vs 883.2 gflops
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	5269 vs 2475
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2344 vs 958
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3357 vs 2304
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	5269 vs 2475
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2344 vs 958
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3357 vs 2304

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

5.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 80 Watt

Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 80 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe
GPU 2: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

5269

2475

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2344

958

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3357

2304

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

5269

2475

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2344

958

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3357

2304

Name	AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	44.281
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	785.276
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.951
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	65.944
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	196.307
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	5269	2475
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2344	958
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3357	2304
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	5269	2475
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2344	958
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3357	2304
PassMark - G3D Mark		1461
PassMark - G2D Mark		569
Geekbench - OpenCL		4466

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Generation 8.0
Code name	Baffin	Broadwell GT3e
Launch date	27 September 2016	5 September 2014
Place in performance rating	816	789
Type	Desktop	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1200 MHz	1150 MHz
Core clock speed	1090 MHz	300 MHz
Floating-point performance	2,150 gflops	883.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	14 nm
Pipelines	896	48
Texture fill rate	57.6 GTexel / s	55.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	80 Watt	15 Watt
Transistor count	3,000 million	189 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 2.0 x1
Supplementary power connectors	None
Laptop size		medium sized
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)	12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	112.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	7000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5
Shared memory		1
Technologies
Quick Sync