AMD Radeon HD 8990 OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8990 OEM and ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8990 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 52% higher core clock speed: 950 MHz vs 625 MHz
- 9.5x more texture fill rate: 2x 128.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 2x 25 GTexel / s billion / sec
- 2.6x more pipelines: 2x 2048 vs 2x 800
- 4.1x better floating-point performance: 2x 4,096 gflops vs 2x 1,000.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 6x more maximum memory size: 2x 3 GB vs 2x 512 MB
- 3x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 1990 MHz
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 658 vs 542
- 4.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5214 vs 1132
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 24 April 2013 vs 7 November 2008 |
Core clock speed | 950 MHz vs 625 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 2x 128.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 2x 25 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Pipelines | 2x 2048 vs 2x 800 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 4,096 gflops vs 2x 1,000.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2x 3 GB vs 2x 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 1990 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 658 vs 542 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5214 vs 1132 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 375 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 375 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8990 OEM
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 8990 OEM | ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 658 | 542 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5214 | 1132 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.481 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1984.655 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.536 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 125.504 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 470.237 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 8990 OEM | ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | Malta | R700 |
Launch date | 24 April 2013 | 7 November 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | $420 |
Place in performance rating | 320 | 245 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 950 MHz | 625 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2x 4,096 gflops | 2x 1,000.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 2x 2048 | 2x 800 |
Texture fill rate | 2x 128.0 GTexel / s billion / sec | 2x 25 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 375 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 956 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | 4x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 307 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2x 3 GB | 2x 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 2x 288.0 GB / s | 2x 63.7 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2x 384 Bit | 2x 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 1990 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |