AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU and ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 88% higher core clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 743 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 80 nm
- Around 3% higher memory clock speed: 1704 MHz vs 1656 MHz
- 7.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4979 vs 660
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 June 2017 vs 14 May 2007 |
Core clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 743 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 80 nm |
Memory clock speed | 1704 MHz vs 1656 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4979 vs 660 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT
- Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 215 Watt vs 300 Watt
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 397 vs 371
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 397 vs 371 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU | ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4979 | 660 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 371 | 397 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 23380 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 102.628 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1762.559 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.26 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 86.313 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 617.099 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1177 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1724 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1177 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1724 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU | ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | Vega 10 | R600 |
Launch date | 27 June 2017 | 14 May 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 682 | 375 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1500 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1400 MHz | 743 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 80 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 215 Watt |
Transistor count | 12,500 million | 720 million |
Floating-point performance | 475.5 gflops | |
Pipelines | 320 | |
Texture fill rate | 11.89 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 241 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 1704 MHz | 1656 MHz |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 106.0 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | |
Memory type | GDDR3 |