AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
3.1x more core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 300 MHz
Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1219 MHz vs 1150 MHz
10.7x more pipelines: 512 vs 48
Around 41% better floating-point performance: 1,248 gflops vs 883 gflops
Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1832 vs 1590
Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 402 vs 377
Around 45% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10199 vs 7012
Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3241 vs 2652
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3709 vs 1564
Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3241 vs 2652
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3709 vs 1564

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	12 June 2017 vs 3 January 2017
Core clock speed	925 MHz vs 300 MHz
Boost clock speed	1219 MHz vs 1150 MHz
Pipelines	512 vs 48
Floating-point performance	1,248 gflops vs 883 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1832 vs 1590
PassMark - G2D Mark	402 vs 377
Geekbench - OpenCL	10199 vs 7012
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3241 vs 2652
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3709 vs 1564
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3350 vs 3340
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3241 vs 2652
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3709 vs 1564
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3350 vs 3340

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650

4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
16x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 2 GB

Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 65 Watt
Maximum memory size	32 GB vs 2 GB

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
GPU 2: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1832

1590

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

402

377

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

10199

7012

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3241

2652

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3709

1564

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3350

3340

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3241

2652

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3709

1564

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3350

3340

Name	AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100	Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
PassMark - G3D Mark	1832	1590
PassMark - G2D Mark	402	377
Geekbench - OpenCL	10199	7012
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	30.848
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	438.581
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.268
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	46.988
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	139.235
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3241	2652
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3709	1564
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3350	3340
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3241	2652
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3709	1564
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3350	3340

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100	Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Generation 9.5
Code name	Lexa	Kaby Lake GT3e
Launch date	12 June 2017	3 January 2017
Launch price (MSRP)	$149
Place in performance rating	815	851
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1219 MHz	1150 MHz
Core clock speed	925 MHz	300 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,248 gflops	883 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	14 nm
Pipelines	512	48
Texture fill rate	39.01 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	65 Watt	15 Watt
Transistor count	2,200 million	189 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x1
Length	145 mm
Supplementary power connectors	None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)	12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	32 GB
Memory bandwidth	56 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	64 / 128 Bit
Memory clock speed	7000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4
Shared memory		1
Technologies
Quick Sync