AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 and Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 22% higher boost clock speed: 1219 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1832 vs 1626
- Around 73% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10199 vs 5885
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3241 vs 2536
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3709 vs 1586
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 2418
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3241 vs 2536
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3709 vs 1586
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 2418
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 June 2017 vs 5 September 2014 |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1219 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1832 vs 1626 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10199 vs 5885 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3241 vs 2536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 vs 1586 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 vs 2418 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3241 vs 2536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 vs 1586 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 vs 2418 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
- 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 572 vs 402
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 572 vs 402 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
GPU 2: Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 | Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1832 | 1626 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 402 | 572 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10199 | 5885 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.848 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 438.581 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.268 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 46.988 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 139.235 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3241 | 2536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 | 1586 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 2418 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3241 | 2536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 | 1586 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 2418 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 | Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Generation 8.0 |
Code name | Lexa | Broadwell GT3e |
Launch date | 12 June 2017 | 5 September 2014 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
Place in performance rating | 815 | 724 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1219 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 800 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,248 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | |
Texture fill rate | 39.01 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,200 million | 189 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | IGP |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 56 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 |