AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 and Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
  • Around 16% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 800 MHz
  • Around 22% higher boost clock speed: 1219 MHz vs 1000 MHz
  • Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1832 vs 1626
  • Around 73% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10199 vs 5885
  • Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3241 vs 2536
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3709 vs 1586
  • Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 2418
  • Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3241 vs 2536
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3709 vs 1586
  • Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 2418
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 12 June 2017 vs 5 September 2014
Core clock speed 925 MHz vs 800 MHz
Boost clock speed 1219 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1832 vs 1626
Geekbench - OpenCL 10199 vs 5885
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3241 vs 2536
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3709 vs 1586
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3350 vs 2418
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3241 vs 2536
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3709 vs 1586
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3350 vs 2418

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300

  • 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
  • Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 572 vs 402
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 572 vs 402

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
GPU 2: Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1832
1626
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
402
572
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
10199
5885
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3241
2536
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3709
1586
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3350
2418
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3241
2536
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3709
1586
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3350
2418
Name AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
PassMark - G3D Mark 1832 1626
PassMark - G2D Mark 402 572
Geekbench - OpenCL 10199 5885
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 30.848
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 438.581
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.268
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 46.988
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 139.235
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3241 2536
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3709 1586
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3350 2418
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3241 2536
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3709 1586
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3350 2418

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300

Essentials

Architecture GCN 4.0 Generation 8.0
Code name Lexa Broadwell GT3e
Launch date 12 June 2017 5 September 2014
Launch price (MSRP) $149
Place in performance rating 815 724
Type Workstation Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1219 MHz 1000 MHz
Core clock speed 925 MHz 800 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,248 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 14 nm
Pipelines 512
Texture fill rate 39.01 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 Watt 15 Watt
Transistor count 2,200 million 189 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 IGP
Length 145 mm
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL 4.5 4.6

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 56 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 7000 MHz
Memory type GDDR5