AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100 vs Intel HD Graphics 5600
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100 and Intel HD Graphics 5600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 3.1x more core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1219 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- 21.3x more pipelines: 512 vs 24
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2523 vs 2264
- 3.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9971 vs 2872
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3607 vs 1598
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3330
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3607 vs 1598
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3330
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 June 2017 vs 5 September 2014 |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1219 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Pipelines | 512 vs 24 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2523 vs 2264 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9971 vs 2872 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3607 vs 1598 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3330 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3607 vs 1598 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3330 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 5600
- 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 463 vs 418
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 463 vs 418 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 5600
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100 | Intel HD Graphics 5600 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2523 | 2264 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 418 | 463 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9971 | 2872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 29.959 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 864.134 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.893 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.305 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 122.245 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4551 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3607 | 1598 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3330 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4551 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3607 | 1598 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3330 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100 | Intel HD Graphics 5600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Generation 8.0 |
Code name | Lexa | Broadwell GT2 |
Launch date | 12 June 2017 | 5 September 2014 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Place in performance rating | 721 | 746 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1219 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 300 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,248 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 24 |
Texture fill rate | 39.01 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,200 million | 1,300 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |