AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 vs AMD FirePro W7170M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 and AMD FirePro W7170M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 66% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 723 MHz
- 4.1x more texture fill rate: 384.0 GTexel / s vs 92.54 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 4096 vs 2048
- 4.1x better floating-point performance: 12,288 gflops vs 2,961 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 4 GB
- 4.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12844 vs 3162
- Around 84% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 769 vs 418
- Around 27% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 64683 vs 50809
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13848 vs 6796
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13848 vs 6796
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 July 2017 vs 2 October 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 723 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 384.0 GTexel / s vs 92.54 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 2048 |
Floating-point performance | 12,288 gflops vs 2,961 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12844 vs 3162 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 769 vs 418 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 64683 vs 50809 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13848 vs 6796 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13848 vs 6796 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W7170M
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 230 Watt
- 2.6x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1890 MHz
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3722 vs 3680
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3362 vs 3336
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3722 vs 3680
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3362 vs 3336
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 230 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 1890 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3722 vs 3680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3362 vs 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3722 vs 3680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3362 vs 3336 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W7170M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 | AMD FirePro W7170M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12844 | 3162 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 769 | 418 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 64683 | 50809 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 174.714 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3924.968 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.305 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 175.219 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1226.861 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13848 | 6796 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3680 | 3722 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 | 3362 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13848 | 6796 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3680 | 3722 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 | 3362 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 | AMD FirePro W7170M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | Vega 10 | Amethyst |
Launch date | 10 July 2017 | 2 October 2015 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,599 | |
Place in performance rating | 196 | 420 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1500 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1200 MHz | 723 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 12,288 gflops | 2,961 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 4096 | 2048 |
Texture fill rate | 384.0 GTexel / s | 92.54 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 12,500 million | 5,000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 6x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 483.8 GB / s | 160.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2048 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1890 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
Enduro |