AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100

• Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1379 MHz
• 2.2x more texture fill rate: 384.0 GTexel / s vs 176.5 GTexel / s
• 2x more pipelines: 4096 vs 2048
• 2.2x better floating-point performance: 12,288 gflops vs 5,648 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
• Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12844 vs 9982
• Around 76% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 769 vs 437
• Around 71% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 64683 vs 37928
• Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3924.968 vs 2293.496
• Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 17.305 vs 12.704
• Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 175.219 vs 139.717
• Around 77% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1226.861 vs 692.9

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q

• Around 1% higher core clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• 2x lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 230 Watt
• 4.2x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 1890 MHz
• Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 214.123 vs 174.714
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14915 vs 13848
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8902 vs 3680
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8048 vs 3336
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14915 vs 13848
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8902 vs 3680
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8048 vs 3336

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	12844 9982
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	769 437
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	64683 37928
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	174.714 214.123
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3924.968 2293.496
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	17.305 12.704
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	175.219 139.717
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1226.861 692.9
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13848 14915
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3680 8902
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3336 8048
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13848 14915
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3680 8902
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3336 8048

Compare specifications (specs)