AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 vs NVIDIA TITAN Xp

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 and NVIDIA TITAN Xp videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
• Around 1% higher texture fill rate: 384.0 GTexel / s vs 379.7 GTexel / s
• Around 7% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 3840
• Around 1% better floating-point performance: 12,288 gflops vs 12,150 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 230 Watt vs 250 Watt
• Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 12 GB
• Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3924.968 vs 2513.321
• 4.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 175.219 vs 43.083
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1226.861 vs 1139.382
• Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13848 vs 10966
• Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13848 vs 10966

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN Xp

• Around 17% higher core clock speed: 1405 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1582 MHz vs 1500 MHz
• 6x more memory clock speed: 11408 MHz vs 1890 MHz
• Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 17881 vs 12844
• Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 934 vs 769
• Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 65368 vs 64683
• Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 256.103 vs 174.714
• Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 19.708 vs 17.305

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN Xp

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	12844 17881
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	769 934
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	64683 65368
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	174.714 256.103
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3924.968 2513.321
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	17.305 19.708
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	175.219 43.083
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1226.861 1139.382
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13848 10966
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3680 3686
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3336 3343
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13848 10966
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3680 3686
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3336 3343

Compare specifications (specs)