AMD Radeon Pro 450 vs AMD Radeon R9 M385

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 450 and AMD Radeon R9 M385 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD Radeon Pro 450

AMD Radeon R9 M385

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 450

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
3.4x more memory clock speed: 5080 MHz vs 1500 MHz
Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2723 vs 2061
2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 619 vs 244
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3344 vs 3322
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3344 vs 3322

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	30 October 2016 vs 5 May 2015
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Memory clock speed	5080 MHz vs 1500 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	2723 vs 2061
PassMark - G2D Mark	619 vs 244
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3344 vs 3322
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3344 vs 3322

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M385

Around 13% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 800 MHz
Around 75% higher texture fill rate: 56 GTexel / s vs 32 GTexel / s
Around 75% better floating-point performance: 1,792 gflops vs 1,024 gflops
2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3002 vs 1749
Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3002 vs 1749

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	900 MHz vs 800 MHz
Texture fill rate	56 GTexel / s vs 32 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance	1,792 gflops vs 1,024 gflops
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3002 vs 1749
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3002 vs 1749

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 450
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M385

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2723

2061

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

619

244

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1749

3002

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3344

3322

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1749

3002

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3344

3322

Name	AMD Radeon Pro 450	AMD Radeon R9 M385
PassMark - G3D Mark	2723	2061
PassMark - G2D Mark	619	244
Geekbench - OpenCL	8903
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	26.707
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	568.609
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.409
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	39.784
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	126.562
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3347
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1749	3002
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3344	3322
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3347
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1749	3002
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3344	3322

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro 450	AMD Radeon R9 M385
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 4.0	GCN 2.0
Code name	Baffin	Strato
Launch date	30 October 2016	5 May 2015
Place in performance rating	788	722
Type	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Design		AMD Radeon R9 300 Series
Technical info
Core clock speed	800 MHz	900 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,024 gflops	1,792 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	640
Texture fill rate	32 GTexel / s	56 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	35 Watt
Transistor count	3,000 million	2,080 million
Boost clock speed		1100 MHz
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Eyefinity
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size	large	medium sized
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)	12
OpenGL	4.5	4.4
Mantle
OpenCL		Not Listed
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	81.28 GB / s	76.8 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 bit
Memory clock speed	5080 MHz	1500 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0	0
Technologies
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready
FreeSync
HDMI 2.0
AMD Eyefinity
DirectCompute 5.0
DualGraphics
HD3D
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
TrueAudio
ZeroCore