AMD Radeon Pro 450 vs Intel HD Graphics 2000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 450 and Intel HD Graphics 2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 450

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 9 month(s) later
  • 106.7x more pipelines: 640 vs 6
  • 100.4x better floating-point performance: 1,024 gflops vs 10.2 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 32 nm
  • 12.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2723 vs 213
  • Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 619 vs 456
  • 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3344 vs 1039
  • 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3344 vs 1039
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 30 October 2016 vs 5 January 2011
Pipelines 640 vs 6
Floating-point performance 1,024 gflops vs 10.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 32 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 2723 vs 213
PassMark - G2D Mark 619 vs 456
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3344 vs 1039
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3344 vs 1039

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 2000

  • Around 6% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 800 MHz
  • 26.6x more texture fill rate: 850 MTexel / s vs 32 GTexel / s
Core clock speed 850 MHz vs 800 MHz
Texture fill rate 850 MTexel / s vs 32 GTexel / s

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 450
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 2000

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
2723
213
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
619
456
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3344
1039
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3344
1039
Name AMD Radeon Pro 450 Intel HD Graphics 2000
PassMark - G3D Mark 2723 213
PassMark - G2D Mark 619 456
Geekbench - OpenCL 8902
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 26.707
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 568.609
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.409
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 39.784
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 126.562
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3347
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1749
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3344 1039
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3347
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1749
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3344 1039

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Pro 450 Intel HD Graphics 2000

Essentials

Architecture GCN 4.0 Generation 6.0
Code name Baffin Sandy Bridge GT1
Launch date 30 October 2016 5 January 2011
Place in performance rating 789 686
Type Mobile workstation Laptop

Technical info

Core clock speed 800 MHz 850 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,024 gflops 10.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 32 nm
Pipelines 640 6
Texture fill rate 32 GTexel / s 850 MTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 35 Watt
Transistor count 3,000 million 189 million
Boost clock speed 1150 MHz

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 1.0 x16
Laptop size large

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 10.1
OpenGL 4.5 3.1

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 81.28 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 64 / 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 5080 MHz
Memory type GDDR5
Shared memory 0 1

Technologies

DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready
FreeSync
HDMI 2.0