AMD Radeon Pro 450 vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 450 and Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 450
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 67% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2723 vs 1626
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 619 vs 572
- Around 51% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8902 vs 5885
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3347 vs 2536
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1749 vs 1586
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3344 vs 2418
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3347 vs 2536
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1749 vs 1586
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3344 vs 2418
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 October 2016 vs 5 September 2014 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2723 vs 1626 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 619 vs 572 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8902 vs 5885 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3347 vs 2536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1749 vs 1586 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 vs 2418 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3347 vs 2536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1749 vs 1586 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 vs 2418 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 450
GPU 2: Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 450 | Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2723 | 1626 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 619 | 572 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8902 | 5885 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.707 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 568.609 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.409 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 39.784 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 126.562 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3347 | 2536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1749 | 1586 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 | 2418 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3347 | 2536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1749 | 1586 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 | 2418 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 450 | Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Generation 8.0 |
Code name | Baffin | Broadwell GT3e |
Launch date | 30 October 2016 | 5 September 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 789 | 721 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 800 MHz | 800 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,024 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | |
Texture fill rate | 32 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 189 million |
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | IGP |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 81.28 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
HDMI 2.0 |