AMD Radeon Pro 450 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 450 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 450

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 4% higher core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 771 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 3.5x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 122 Watt
• Around 2% higher memory clock speed: 5080 MHz vs 5000 MHz
• 28.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3347 vs 117
• 16.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1749 vs 108.2
• 27.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3344 vs 119.7

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition

• 3.2x more texture fill rate: 102.0 GTexel / s vs 32 GTexel / s
• 2.4x more pipelines: 1536 vs 640
• 2.4x better floating-point performance: 2,448 gflops vs 1,024 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 33.184 vs 26.707
• Around 76% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1002.196 vs 568.609
• Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.261 vs 2.409
• Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 54.752 vs 39.784
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6912 vs 3347
• 3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6710 vs 1749
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6703 vs 3344

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 450
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	26.707 33.184
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	568.609 1002.196
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.409 3.261
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	39.784 54.752
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	126.562 126.579
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3347 6912
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1749 6710
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3344 6703
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3347 117
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1749 108.2
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3344 119.7

Compare specifications (specs)