AMD Radeon Pro 450 vs NVIDIA Quadro M1000M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 450 and NVIDIA Quadro M1000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon Pro 450

NVIDIA Quadro M1000M

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 450

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
Around 1% higher texture fill rate: 32 GTexel / s vs 31.78 GTexel / s
Around 25% higher pipelines: 640 vs 512
Around 1% better floating-point performance: 1,024 gflops vs 1,017 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
Around 14% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 40 Watt
1024x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 2 GB / 4 GB
Around 1% higher memory clock speed: 5080 MHz vs 5012 MHz
2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 619 vs 307
Around 3% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9114 vs 8849

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	30 October 2016 vs 18 August 2015
Texture fill rate	32 GTexel / s vs 31.78 GTexel / s
Pipelines	640 vs 512
Floating-point performance	1,024 gflops vs 1,017 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	35 Watt vs 40 Watt
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 2 GB / 4 GB
Memory clock speed	5080 MHz vs 5012 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	619 vs 307
Geekbench - OpenCL	9114 vs 8849

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M1000M

Around 24% higher core clock speed: 993 MHz vs 800 MHz
Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2835 vs 2723
Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 38.33 vs 26.707
Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 721.18 vs 568.609
Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.056 vs 2.409
Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 42.938 vs 39.784
Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 137.786 vs 126.562
Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4196 vs 3347
2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 1749
Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4196 vs 3347
2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 1749

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	993 MHz vs 800 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	2835 vs 2723
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	38.33 vs 26.707
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	721.18 vs 568.609
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.056 vs 2.409
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	42.938 vs 39.784
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	137.786 vs 126.562
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4196 vs 3347
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3716 vs 1749
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358 vs 3344
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4196 vs 3347
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3716 vs 1749
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358 vs 3344

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 450
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M1000M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2723

2835

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

619

307

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

9114

8849

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

26.707

38.33

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

568.609

721.18

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2.409

3.056

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

39.784

42.938

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

126.562

137.786

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3347

4196

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1749

3716

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3344

3358

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3347

4196

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1749

3716

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3344

3358

Name	AMD Radeon Pro 450	NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
PassMark - G3D Mark	2723	2835
PassMark - G2D Mark	619	307
Geekbench - OpenCL	9114	8849
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	26.707	38.33
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	568.609	721.18
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.409	3.056
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	39.784	42.938
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	126.562	137.786
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3347	4196
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1749	3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3344	3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3347	4196
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1749	3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3344	3358
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		1002

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro 450	NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Maxwell
Code name	Baffin	GM107
Launch date	30 October 2016	18 August 2015
Place in performance rating	786	806
Type	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$200.89
Price now		$203.37
Value for money (0-100)		16.10
Technical info
Core clock speed	800 MHz	993 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,024 gflops	1,017 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	640	512
Texture fill rate	32 GTexel / s	31.78 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	35 Watt	40 Watt
Transistor count	3,000 million	1,870 million
Boost clock speed		1072 MHz
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port		1.2
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	MXM-A (3.0)
Laptop size	large	large
Supplementary power connectors		None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)	12
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Shader Model		5.0
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB / 4 GB
Memory bandwidth	81.28 GB / s	80 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5080 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0	0
Technologies
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready
FreeSync
HDMI 2.0
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus