AMD Radeon Pro 455 vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 455 and Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 455
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 4.3x more core clock speed: 855 MHz vs 200 MHz
- 3.9x more texture fill rate: 41.04 GTexel / s vs 10.4 GTexel / s
- 19.2x more pipelines: 768 vs 40
- 12.6x better floating-point performance: 1,313 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 22 nm
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3113 vs 1191
- Around 77% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 705 vs 399
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11291 vs 5081
- Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4146 vs 2095
- Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4146 vs 2095
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 30 October 2016 vs 27 May 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 855 MHz vs 200 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 41.04 GTexel / s vs 10.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 40 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,313 gflops vs 104.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 22 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3113 vs 1191 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 705 vs 399 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11291 vs 5081 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4146 vs 2095 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4146 vs 2095 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
- Around 17% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3285 vs 1762
- Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3285 vs 1762
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 35 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3285 vs 1762 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3285 vs 1762 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 455
GPU 2: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro 455 | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3113 | 1191 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 705 | 399 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11291 | 5081 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.484 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 573.646 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.854 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.793 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 148.673 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4146 | 2095 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1762 | 3285 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4146 | 2095 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1762 | 3285 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro 455 | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Generation 7.5 |
| Code name | Baffin | Haswell GT3e |
| Launch date | 30 October 2016 | 27 May 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 673 | 644 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 855 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,313 gflops | 104.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 22 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 40 |
| Texture fill rate | 41.04 GTexel / s | 10.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 392 million |
| Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | medium sized |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 81.28 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | eDRAM |
| Shared memory | 0 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HDMI 2.0 | ||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro 455 with others
AMDRadeon Pro 455 vs
ATIRadeon X1550
AMDRadeon Pro 455 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7150 + nForce 630i
AMDRadeon Pro 455 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6970
AMDRadeon Pro 455 vs
AMDFirePro D300
AMDRadeon Pro 455 vs
AMDFirePro W5170M
AMDRadeon Pro 455 vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
