AMD Radeon Pro 5300 vs AMD Radeon HD 7670A
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5300 and AMD Radeon HD 7670A videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5300
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 67% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 9166.7x more texture fill rate: 132.0 GTexel/s vs 14.4 GTexel / s
- 2.7x more pipelines: 1280 vs 480
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- 6.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7230 vs 1050
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 Aug 2020 vs 5 January 2012 |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 132.0 GTexel/s vs 14.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 480 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7230 vs 1050 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7670A
- Around 89% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 85 Watt
- 2.3x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 702 vs 634
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 85 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 702 vs 634 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5300
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7670A
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 5300 | AMD Radeon HD 7670A |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 38625 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 634 | 702 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7230 | 1050 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 5300 | AMD Radeon HD 7670A | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Navi 14 | Turks |
Launch date | 4 Aug 2020 | 5 January 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 184 | 163 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz | |
Compute units | 20 | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 600 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 40 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 264.0 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.448 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.224 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1280 | 480 |
Pixel fill rate | 52.80 GPixel/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Texture fill rate | 132.0 GTexel/s | 14.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 45 Watt |
Transistor count | 6400 million | 716 million |
Floating-point performance | 576.0 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 64 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 4000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |