AMD Radeon Pro 5300 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5300 and AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5300
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 7% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 931 MHz
- Around 63% higher boost clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 1011 MHz
- 1632x more texture fill rate: 132.0 GTexel/s vs 80.88 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1400 MHz
- Around 96% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 38688 vs 19699
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 634 vs 485
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7230 vs 3616
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 Aug 2020 vs 1 February 2018 |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 931 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz vs 1011 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 132.0 GTexel/s vs 80.88 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 38688 vs 19699 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 634 vs 485 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7230 vs 3616 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
- Around 31% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 85 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 85 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5300
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 5300 | AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 38688 | 19699 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 634 | 485 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7230 | 3616 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 58.971 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1235.247 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.134 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 75.289 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 252.311 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6318 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2070 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1514 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6318 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2070 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1514 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2091 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 5300 | AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Navi 14 | Polaris 22 |
Launch date | 4 Aug 2020 | 1 February 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 187 | 618 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz | 1011 MHz |
Compute units | 20 | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 931 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 264.0 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.448 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.224 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1280 | 1280 |
Pixel fill rate | 52.80 GPixel/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Texture fill rate | 132.0 GTexel/s | 80.88 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 65 Watt |
Transistor count | 6400 million | |
Floating-point performance | 2,588 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | IGP |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 204.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 1024 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 1400 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Shared memory | 0 |