AMD Radeon Pro 5300 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 565v
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5300 and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 565v videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5300
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 48% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 675 MHz
- 6111.1x more texture fill rate: 132.0 GTexel/s vs 21.6 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 1280 vs 320
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 55 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 9% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1600 MHz
- Around 99% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 634 vs 318
- 20.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7230 vs 353
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 Aug 2020 vs 5 May 2010 |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 675 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 132.0 GTexel/s vs 21.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 320 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 634 vs 318 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7230 vs 353 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 565v
- 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 85 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 85 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5300
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 565v
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 5300 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 565v |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 38625 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 634 | 318 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7230 | 353 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 5300 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 565v | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | Navi 14 | M96 |
Launch date | 4 Aug 2020 | 5 May 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 184 | 492 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz | |
Compute units | 20 | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 675 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 55 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 264.0 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.448 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.224 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1280 | 320 |
Pixel fill rate | 52.80 GPixel/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Texture fill rate | 132.0 GTexel/s | 21.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 20 Watt |
Transistor count | 6400 million | 514 million |
Floating-point performance | 432.0 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 10.1 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR3, DDR3, DDR2 |
Shared memory | 0 |