AMD Radeon Pro 5300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5300 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5300
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 56% higher boost clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 1058 MHz
- 1024.8x more texture fill rate: 132.0 GTexel/s vs 128.8 billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 195 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2048 MB
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 38625 vs 18432
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 634 vs 533
- Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7230 vs 5545
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 4 Aug 2020 vs 22 March 2012 |
| Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz vs 1058 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 132.0 GTexel/s vs 128.8 billion / sec |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt vs 195 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2048 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 38625 vs 18432 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 634 vs 533 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7230 vs 5545 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 1006 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 1536 vs 1280
- 3.4x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
| Core clock speed | 1006 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1536 vs 1280 |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5300
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro 5300 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 38625 | 18432 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 634 | 533 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7230 | 5545 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.086 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 989.685 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.645 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 36.463 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 99.577 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7222 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3666 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3306 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7222 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3666 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3306 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1989 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro 5300 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Navi 14 | GK104 |
| Launch date | 4 Aug 2020 | 22 March 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 184 | 553 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
| Price now | $579.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 12.83 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz | 1058 MHz |
| Compute units | 20 | |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1006 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 264.0 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.448 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.224 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 1536 |
| Pixel fill rate | 52.80 GPixel/s | |
| Render output units | 32 | |
| Texture fill rate | 132.0 GTexel/s | 128.8 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 195 Watt |
| Transistor count | 6400 million | 3,540 million |
| CUDA cores | 1536 | |
| Floating-point performance | 3,090.4 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | Two 6-pin |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 10.0" (25.4 cm) | |
| SLI options | 3-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2048 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 192.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256-bit GDDR5 |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 6008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro 5300 with others
AMDRadeon Pro 5300 vs
NVIDIAGRID M6-8Q
AMDRadeon Pro 5300 vs
NVIDIATesla P100 PCIe 16 GB
AMDRadeon Pro 5300 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
AMDRadeon Pro 5300 vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
AMDRadeon Pro 5300 vs
NVIDIARTX A1000 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro 5300 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 6GB
