AMD Radeon Pro 5300 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5300 and NVIDIA Quadro M2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5300
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 26% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 796 MHz
- Around 42% higher boost clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 1163 MHz
- 2330.5x more texture fill rate: 132.0 GTexel/s vs 56.64 GTexel / s
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 768
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 38625 vs 13999
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 634 vs 569
- Around 81% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7230 vs 3997
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 Aug 2020 vs 8 April 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 796 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz vs 1163 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 132.0 GTexel/s vs 56.64 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 768 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 38625 vs 13999 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 634 vs 569 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7230 vs 3997 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M2000
- Around 13% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 85 Watt
- 3.8x more memory clock speed: 6612 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 85 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 6612 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5300
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M2000
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 5300 | NVIDIA Quadro M2000 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 38625 | 13999 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 634 | 569 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7230 | 3997 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 55.048 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 639.056 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.697 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.796 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 225.868 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5523 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3325 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5523 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3325 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 5300 | NVIDIA Quadro M2000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Navi 14 | GM206 |
Launch date | 4 Aug 2020 | 8 April 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 184 | 580 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $437.75 | |
Price now | $409.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.23 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz | 1163 MHz |
Compute units | 20 | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 796 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 264.0 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.448 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.224 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1280 | 768 |
Pixel fill rate | 52.80 GPixel/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Texture fill rate | 132.0 GTexel/s | 56.64 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 6400 million | 2,940 million |
Floating-point performance | 1,812 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort, DP DP DP DP |
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Length | 201 mm | |
Width | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 6612 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | 128 Bit |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |