AMD Radeon Pro 5300M vs AMD Radeon R9 380X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5300M and AMD Radeon R9 380X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 29% higher boost clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 970 MHz
- 805.2x more texture fill rate: 100 GTexel/s vs 124.2 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 190 Watt
- 12.4x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 970 MHz
Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 vs 19 November 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz vs 970 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 100 GTexel/s vs 124.2 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt vs 190 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 970 MHz |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 380X
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1280
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9685 vs 7730
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9685 vs 7730
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3595
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3595
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 667 vs 618
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6224 vs 5994
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 1280 |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9685 vs 7730 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9685 vs 7730 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3595 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3595 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 3350 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 667 vs 618 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6224 vs 5994 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 380X
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 5300M | AMD Radeon R9 380X |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 29410 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7730 | 9685 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7730 | 9685 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3595 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3595 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 3361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 3361 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 618 | 667 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5994 | 6224 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3053 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 5300M | AMD Radeon R9 380X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | Navi 14 | Antigua |
Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 | 19 November 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 355 | 313 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | |
Price now | $528.44 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.61 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz | 970 MHz |
Compute units | 20 | 32 |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 200 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.400 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.200 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1280 | 2048 |
Pixel fill rate | 40 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 100 GTexel/s | 124.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 190 Watt |
Transistor count | 6400 million | 5,000 million |
Floating-point performance | 3,973 gflops | |
Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2 x 6-pin |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
Length | 221 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 182.4 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 64 bit |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 970 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
FRTC | ||
HD3D | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore |