AMD Radeon Pro 5300M vs ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5300M and ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 60% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 625 MHz
- 444.4x more texture fill rate: 100 GTexel/s vs 2x 25 GTexel / s billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 55 nm
- 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2x 512 MB
- 6x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 1990 MHz
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 617 vs 542
- 5.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5996 vs 1132
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 vs 7 November 2008 |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 625 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 100 GTexel/s vs 2x 25 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2x 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 1990 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 617 vs 542 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5996 vs 1132 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 2x 800 vs 1280
Pipelines | 2x 800 vs 1280 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 5300M | ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 29450 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7730 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7730 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3595 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3595 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 617 | 542 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5996 | 1132 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 5300M | ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | Navi 14 | R700 |
Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 | 7 November 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 354 | 244 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $420 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz | |
Compute units | 20 | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 625 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 55 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 200 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.400 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.200 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1280 | 2x 800 |
Pixel fill rate | 40 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 100 GTexel/s | 2x 25 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 6400 million | 956 million |
Floating-point performance | 2x 1,000.0 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 10.1 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2x 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 2x 63.7 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 2x 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 1990 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR3 |