AMD Radeon Pro 5300M vs NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5300M and NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 930 MHz
- Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 1180 MHz
- 662.3x more texture fill rate: 100 GTexel/s vs 151.0 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 225 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.4x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7730 vs 5460
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7730 vs 5460
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3595 vs 3526
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3595 vs 3526
- Around 98% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 617 vs 311
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5996 vs 5203
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 vs 30 August 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 930 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz vs 1180 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 100 GTexel/s vs 151.0 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt vs 225 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7730 vs 5460 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7730 vs 5460 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3595 vs 3526 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3595 vs 3526 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 617 vs 311 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5996 vs 5203 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1280
| Pipelines | 2048 vs 1280 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro 5300M | NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 29450 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7730 | 5460 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7730 | 5460 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3595 | 3526 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3595 | 3526 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 3350 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 617 | 311 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5996 | 5203 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro 5300M | NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | Navi 14 | GM204 |
| Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 | 30 August 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 354 | 474 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz | 1180 MHz |
| Compute units | 20 | |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 930 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 200 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.400 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.200 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 2048 |
| Pixel fill rate | 40 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 100 GTexel/s | 151.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Transistor count | 6400 million | 5,200 million |
| Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 160.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro 5300M with others
AMDRadeon Pro 5300M vs
ATIFireGL V7700
AMDRadeon Pro 5300M vs
AMDRadeon HD 7730
AMDRadeon Pro 5300M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970
AMDRadeon Pro 5300M vs
NVIDIATesla M6
AMDRadeon Pro 5300M vs
NVIDIATesla P4
AMDRadeon Pro 5300M vs
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile
