AMD Radeon Pro 5300M vs NVIDIA GRID M60-8Q
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5300M and NVIDIA GRID M60-8Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 930 MHz
- Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 1180 MHz
- 662.3x more texture fill rate: 100 GTexel/s vs 151.0 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 225 Watt
- 2.4x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- Around 6% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 29353 vs 27798
- Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5997 vs 3884
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 vs 30 August 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 930 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz vs 1180 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 100 GTexel/s vs 151.0 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 29353 vs 27798 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 620 vs 618 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5997 vs 3884 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID M60-8Q
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1280
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8909 vs 7730
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8909 vs 7730
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3709 vs 3595
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3709 vs 3595
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 1280 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8909 vs 7730 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8909 vs 7730 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 vs 3595 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 vs 3595 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3350 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID M60-8Q
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 5300M | NVIDIA GRID M60-8Q |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 29353 | 27798 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7730 | 8909 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7730 | 8909 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3595 | 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3595 | 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 3359 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 620 | 618 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5997 | 3884 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 5300M | NVIDIA GRID M60-8Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Navi 14 | GM204 |
Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 | 30 August 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 355 | 348 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz | 1180 MHz |
Compute units | 20 | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 930 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 200 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.400 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.200 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1280 | 2048 |
Pixel fill rate | 40 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 100 GTexel/s | 151.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 6400 million | 5,200 million |
Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 160.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |