AMD Radeon Pro 5300M vs NVIDIA P106-100

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5300M and NVIDIA P106-100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon Pro 5300M

NVIDIA P106-100

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5300M

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
731.5x more texture fill rate: 100 GTexel/s vs 136.7 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 16 nm
Around 41% lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 120 Watt
Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 8008 MHz
Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3595 vs 1860
Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3595 vs 1860
Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 1680
Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 1680
2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 618 vs 255

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	13 Nov 2019 vs 19 June 2017
Texture fill rate	100 GTexel/s vs 136.7 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm vs 16 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	85 Watt vs 120 Watt
Memory clock speed	12000 MHz vs 8008 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3595 vs 1860
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3595 vs 1860
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3350 vs 1680
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3350 vs 1680
PassMark - G2D Mark	618 vs 255

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA P106-100

Around 51% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Around 37% higher boost clock speed: 1709 MHz vs 1250 MHz
Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
Around 18% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 34712 vs 29397
Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12824 vs 7730
Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12824 vs 7730
Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6357 vs 5994

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1506 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Boost clock speed	1709 MHz vs 1250 MHz
Maximum memory size	6 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	34712 vs 29397
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	12824 vs 7730
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	12824 vs 7730
PassMark - G3D Mark	6357 vs 5994

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
GPU 2: NVIDIA P106-100

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

29397

34712

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7730

12824

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7730

12824

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3595

1860

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3595

1860

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3350

1680

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3350

1680

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

618

255

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

5994

6357

Name	AMD Radeon Pro 5300M	NVIDIA P106-100
Geekbench - OpenCL	29397	34712
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	7730	12824
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	7730	12824
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3595	1860
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3595	1860
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3350	1680
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3350	1680
PassMark - G2D Mark	618	255
PassMark - G3D Mark	5994	6357
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		163.993
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1705.321
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		9.266
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		76.32
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		448.036
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		4061

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro 5300M	NVIDIA P106-100
Essentials
Architecture	RDNA 1.0	Pascal
Code name	Navi 14	GP106
Launch date	13 Nov 2019	19 June 2017
Place in performance rating	355	425
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1250 MHz	1709 MHz
Compute units	20
Core clock speed	1000 MHz	1506 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	16 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	200 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	6.400 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	3.200 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1280	1280
Pixel fill rate	40 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	100 GTexel/s	136.7 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	85 Watt	120 Watt
Transistor count	6400 million	4,400 million
Floating-point performance		4,375 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size	medium sized
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin
Length		250 mm
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	6 GB
Memory bandwidth	192 GB/s	192.2 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	12000 MHz	8008 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5