AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 38% higher core clock speed: 1187 MHz vs 863 MHz
- Around 95% higher boost clock speed: 1757 MHz vs 900 MHz
- 1051.1x more texture fill rate: 168.7 GTexel/s vs 160.5 billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 125 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 3 GB
- Around 77% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 42529 vs 24047
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 Aug 2020 vs 23 May 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1187 MHz vs 863 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1757 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 168.7 GTexel/s vs 160.5 billion / sec |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 3 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 42529 vs 24047 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1536
- 3.4x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
Pipelines | 2304 vs 1536 |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 42529 | 24047 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8012 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 591 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 57.735 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1269.688 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.505 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.407 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 174.323 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9064 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9064 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2784 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Navi 14 | GK110 |
Launch date | 4 Aug 2020 | 23 May 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 512 | 454 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | |
Price now | $740.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 12.94 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1757 MHz | 900 MHz |
Compute units | 24 | |
Core clock speed | 1187 MHz | 863 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 337.3 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.80 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.398 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1536 | 2304 |
Pixel fill rate | 56.22 GPixel/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Texture fill rate | 168.7 GTexel/s | 160.5 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 6400 million | 7,080 million |
CUDA cores | 2304 | |
Floating-point performance | 4,156 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 95 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | One 8-pin and one 6-pin |
Width | IGP | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Minimum recommended system power | 600 Watt | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 3 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | 288.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 6008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
PhysX | ||
TXAA |