AMD Radeon Pro 5500M vs AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5500M and AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 926 MHz
- Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 1206 MHz
- 808.3x more texture fill rate: 124.8 GTexel/s vs 154.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 41% lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 120 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 82% higher memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 6600 MHz
- Around 6% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 36526 vs 34593
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1860.146 vs 1817.005
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 11.238 vs 9.511
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 596.819 vs 511.362
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3670 vs 2443
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 1674
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3670 vs 2443
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 1674
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 vs 4 August 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 926 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 1206 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 124.8 GTexel/s vs 154.4 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt vs 120 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 6600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 36526 vs 34593 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1860.146 vs 1817.005 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.238 vs 9.511 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 596.819 vs 511.362 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3670 vs 2443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 1674 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3670 vs 2443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 1674 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1536
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8023 vs 6820
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 728 vs 675
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 111.543 vs 105.82
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 99.875 vs 94.947
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9983 vs 9175
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9983 vs 9175
- Around 8% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3700 vs 3426
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 1536 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8023 vs 6820 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 728 vs 675 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.543 vs 105.82 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.875 vs 94.947 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9983 vs 9175 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9983 vs 9175 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3700 vs 3426 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 5500M | AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6820 | 8023 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 675 | 728 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 36526 | 34593 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.82 | 111.543 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1860.146 | 1817.005 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.238 | 9.511 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.947 | 99.875 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 596.819 | 511.362 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9175 | 9983 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3670 | 2443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 1674 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9175 | 9983 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3670 | 2443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 1674 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3426 | 3700 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M | AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Navi 14 | Ellesmere |
Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 | 4 August 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 365 | 369 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | Radeon RX 400 Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $179 | |
Price now | $109.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 100.00 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | 1206 MHz |
Compute units | 24 | 32 |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 926 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 249.6 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.994 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1536 | 2048 |
Pixel fill rate | 41.60 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 124.8 GTexel/s | 154.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 120 Watt |
Transistor count | 6400 million | 5,700 million |
Floating-point performance | 4.9 TFLOPs | |
GPU Power | 85-110 Watt | |
Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Length | 241 mm | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 211 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 6600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
CrossFire | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore |