AMD Radeon Pro 5500M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5500M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 912.9x more texture fill rate: 124.8 GTexel/s vs 136.7 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 1536 vs 1280
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 41% lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 120 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 8008 MHz
- Around 9% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 36530 vs 33551
- Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1860.146 vs 1373.562
- Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 11.238 vs 8.694
- 4.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.947 vs 21.766
- Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 596.819 vs 454.799
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 vs 19 July 2016 |
Texture fill rate | 124.8 GTexel/s vs 136.7 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1536 vs 1280 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt vs 120 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 8008 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 36530 vs 33551 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1860.146 vs 1373.562 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.238 vs 8.694 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.947 vs 21.766 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 596.819 vs 454.799 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3340 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
- Around 51% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 31% higher boost clock speed: 1709 MHz vs 1300 MHz
- Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10080 vs 6834
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 752 vs 675
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 119.148 vs 105.82
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12442 vs 9175
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3691 vs 3670
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12442 vs 9175
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3691 vs 3670
- Around 23% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4202 vs 3426
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1709 MHz vs 1300 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10080 vs 6834 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 752 vs 675 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 119.148 vs 105.82 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12442 vs 9175 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 vs 3670 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12442 vs 9175 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 vs 3670 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4202 vs 3426 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 5500M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6834 | 10080 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 675 | 752 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 36530 | 33551 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.82 | 119.148 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1860.146 | 1373.562 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.238 | 8.694 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.947 | 21.766 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 596.819 | 454.799 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9175 | 12442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3670 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9175 | 12442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3670 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3340 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3426 | 4202 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Navi 14 | GP106 |
Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 | 19 July 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 365 | 338 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $299 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | 1709 MHz |
Compute units | 24 | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 249.6 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.994 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1536 | 1280 |
Pixel fill rate | 41.60 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 124.8 GTexel/s | 136.7 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 120 Watt |
Transistor count | 6400 million | 4,400 million |
Floating-point performance | 4,375 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Length | 250 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 192.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 8008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |