AMD Radeon Pro 5500M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5500M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 915 MHz
- Around 33% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 980 MHz
- 1136.6x more texture fill rate: 124.8 GTexel/s vs 109.8 GTexel / s
- Around 14% higher pipelines: 1536 vs 1344
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 170 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
- 2x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 6008 MHz
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6834 vs 5427
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9175 vs 8276
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3670 vs 3627
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9175 vs 8276
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3670 vs 3627
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 vs 25 August 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 915 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 980 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 124.8 GTexel/s vs 109.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1536 vs 1344 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt vs 170 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 6008 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6834 vs 5427 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9175 vs 8276 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3670 vs 3627 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9175 vs 8276 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3670 vs 3627 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 694 vs 675
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 694 vs 675 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 3353 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 5500M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6834 | 5427 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 675 | 694 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 36530 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.82 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1860.146 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.238 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.947 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 596.819 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9175 | 8276 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3670 | 3627 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9175 | 8276 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3670 | 3627 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3354 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3426 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Navi 14 | GK104 |
Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 | 25 August 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 365 | 307 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | 980 MHz |
Compute units | 24 | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 915 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 249.6 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.994 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1536 | 1344 |
Pixel fill rate | 41.60 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 124.8 GTexel/s | 109.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 170 Watt |
Transistor count | 6400 million | 3,540 million |
Floating-point performance | 2,634 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
Length | 241 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 192.3 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 6008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |