AMD Radeon Pro 5500M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5500M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 1178 MHz
- 1145x more texture fill rate: 124.8 GTexel/s vs 109 billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 74% lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 148 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 1714.3x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
- Around 35% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 36530 vs 27020
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 105.82 vs 105.107
- Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1860.146 vs 1225.96
- Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 11.238 vs 8.76
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.947 vs 35.714
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 596.819 vs 489.884
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 vs 19 September 2014 |
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 1178 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 124.8 GTexel/s vs 109 billion / sec |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt vs 148 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 36530 vs 27020 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.82 vs 105.107 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1860.146 vs 1225.96 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.238 vs 8.76 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.947 vs 35.714 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 596.819 vs 489.884 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3340 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 8% higher pipelines: 1664 vs 1536
- Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9646 vs 6834
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 773 vs 675
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11499 vs 9175
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 vs 3670
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11499 vs 9175
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 vs 3670
- Around 6% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3622 vs 3426
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Pipelines | 1664 vs 1536 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9646 vs 6834 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 773 vs 675 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11499 vs 9175 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 vs 3670 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11499 vs 9175 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 vs 3670 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3622 vs 3426 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 5500M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6834 | 9646 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 675 | 773 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 36530 | 27020 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.82 | 105.107 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1860.146 | 1225.96 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.238 | 8.76 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.947 | 35.714 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 596.819 | 489.884 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9175 | 11499 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3670 | 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9175 | 11499 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3670 | 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3340 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3426 | 3622 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Navi 14 | GM204 |
Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 | 19 September 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 365 | 357 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $329 | |
Price now | $407.76 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 28.59 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | 1178 MHz |
Compute units | 24 | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 249.6 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.994 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1536 | 1664 |
Pixel fill rate | 41.60 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 124.8 GTexel/s | 109 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 148 Watt |
Transistor count | 6400 million | 5,200 million |
CUDA cores | 1664 | |
Floating-point performance | 3,920 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 98 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pins |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
SLI options | 4x | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 224 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 7.0 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |