AMD Radeon Pro 5500M vs NVIDIA Quadro M5000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5500M and NVIDIA Quadro M5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 861 MHz
- Around 25% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 1038 MHz
- 939.1x more texture fill rate: 124.8 GTexel/s vs 132.9 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 76% lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 81% higher memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 6612 MHz
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 676 vs 658
- Around 29% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 36445 vs 28201
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 105.82 vs 99.169
- Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1860.146 vs 1183.119
- Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 11.238 vs 7.899
- Around 78% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.947 vs 53.364
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 596.819 vs 498.551
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 3324
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 3324
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 vs 29 June 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 861 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 1038 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 124.8 GTexel/s vs 132.9 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 6612 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 676 vs 658 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 36445 vs 28201 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.82 vs 99.169 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1860.146 vs 1183.119 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.238 vs 7.899 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.947 vs 53.364 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 596.819 vs 498.551 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3324 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3324 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M5000
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1536
- Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9387 vs 6816
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12524 vs 9175
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12524 vs 9175
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 1536 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9387 vs 6816 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12524 vs 9175 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3677 vs 3670 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12524 vs 9175 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3677 vs 3670 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M5000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 5500M | NVIDIA Quadro M5000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6816 | 9387 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 676 | 658 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 36445 | 28201 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.82 | 99.169 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1860.146 | 1183.119 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.238 | 7.899 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.947 | 53.364 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 596.819 | 498.551 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9175 | 12524 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3670 | 3677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3324 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9175 | 12524 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3670 | 3677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3324 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3426 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M | NVIDIA Quadro M5000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Navi 14 | GM204 |
Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 | 29 June 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 365 | 341 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,856.99 | |
Price now | $1,498 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 7.47 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | 1038 MHz |
Compute units | 24 | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 861 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 249.6 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.994 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1536 | 2048 |
Pixel fill rate | 41.60 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 124.8 GTexel/s | 132.9 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 6400 million | 5,200 million |
Floating-point performance | 4,252 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | DVI-I DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo, 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort |
Multi-display synchronization | Quadro Sync | |
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1 x 6-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
SLI options | 1 | |
Width | 2" (5.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 6612 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | 256 Bit |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
ECC (Error Correcting Code) | ||
High-Performance Video I/O6 | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |