AMD Radeon Pro 5500M vs NVIDIA Tesla K20m

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5500M and NVIDIA Tesla K20m videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5500M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• Around 42% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 706 MHz
• 850.1x more texture fill rate: 124.8 GTexel/s vs 146.8 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
• 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 225 Watt
• Around 60% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 5 GB
• 2.3x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 5200 MHz
• Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6820 vs 4432
• 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 675 vs 210
• 2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 36524 vs 14510
• Around 93% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 105.82 vs 54.89
• Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1860.146 vs 1414.755
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 11.238 vs 5.303
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.947 vs 83.807
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 596.819 vs 250.291
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9175 vs 8319
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9175 vs 8319

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K20m

• Around 63% higher pipelines: 2496 vs 1536
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7337 vs 3670
• 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10873 vs 3353
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7337 vs 3670
• 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10873 vs 3353

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K20m

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	6820 4432
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	675 210
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	36524 14510
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	105.82 54.89
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1860.146 1414.755
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11.238 5.303
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	94.947 83.807
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	596.819 250.291
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9175 8319
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3670 7337
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3353 10873
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9175 8319
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3670 7337
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3353 10873

Compare specifications (specs)