AMD Radeon Pro 5500M vs NVIDIA Titan X Pascal

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5500M and NVIDIA Titan X Pascal videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5500M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• 364x more texture fill rate: 124.8 GTexel/s vs 342.9 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 16 nm
• 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 250 Watt
• Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 10008 MHz
• 4.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.947 vs 21.354
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 3333
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 3333

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Titan X Pascal

• Around 42% higher core clock speed: 1417 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• Around 18% higher boost clock speed: 1531 MHz vs 1300 MHz
• 2.3x more pipelines: 3584 vs 1536
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
• Around 73% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 63287 vs 36530
• Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 165.792 vs 105.82
• Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2368.267 vs 1860.146
• Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 17.829 vs 11.238
• Around 66% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 992.132 vs 596.819
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10841 vs 9175
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3696 vs 3670
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10841 vs 9175
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3696 vs 3670
• 2.8x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 9560 vs 3426

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Titan X Pascal

Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	36530 63287
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	105.82 165.792
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1860.146 2368.267
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11.238 17.829
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	94.947 21.354
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	596.819 992.132
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9175 10841
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3670 3696
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3353 3333
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9175 10841
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3670 3696
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3353 3333
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	3426 9560

Compare specifications (specs)