AMD Radeon Pro 555X vs ATI Radeon X1950 GT
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 555X and ATI Radeon X1950 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 555X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 81% higher core clock speed: 907 MHz vs 500 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 80 nm
- 4.3x more memory clock speed: 5100 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 2517
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 2517
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 16 July 2018 vs 29 January 2007 |
Core clock speed | 907 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 80 nm |
Memory clock speed | 5100 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 2517 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 2517 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon X1950 GT
- Around 32% lower typical power consumption: 57 Watt vs 75 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 57 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 555X
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X1950 GT
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 555X | ATI Radeon X1950 GT |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12519 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.283 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 668.308 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.158 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.593 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 170.952 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4093 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2350 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 2517 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4093 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2350 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 2517 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 106 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 279 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 555X | ATI Radeon X1950 GT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | R500 |
Code name | Polaris 21 | RV570 |
Launch date | 16 July 2018 | 29 January 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 980 | 937 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $140 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 907 MHz | 500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 57 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 330 million |
Texture fill rate | 6 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5100 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 38.4 GB / s |