AMD Radeon Pro 5600M vs AMD Radeon Pro 580
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5600M and AMD Radeon Pro 580 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 853.9x more texture fill rate: 164.8 GTexel/s vs 193.0 GTexel / s
- Around 11% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 2304
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 21% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 48379 vs 40068
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10296 vs 10113
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10296 vs 10113
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 2900
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 2900
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9282 vs 7753
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 Jun 2020 vs 5 June 2017 |
Texture fill rate | 164.8 GTexel/s vs 193.0 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 2304 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 48379 vs 40068 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10296 vs 10113 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10296 vs 10113 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 2900 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 2900 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 3353 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9282 vs 7753 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 580
- Around 10% higher core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 17% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1030 MHz
- 8.8x more memory clock speed: 6780 MHz vs 770 MHz (1540 MHz effective)
- Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 943 vs 685
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 1030 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 6780 MHz vs 770 MHz (1540 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 943 vs 685 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 580
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 5600M | AMD Radeon Pro 580 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 48379 | 40068 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10296 | 10113 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10296 | 10113 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 2900 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 2900 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3353 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 685 | 943 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9282 | 7753 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 109.521 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1206.829 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.88 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.944 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 511.984 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 5600M | AMD Radeon Pro 580 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Navi 12 | Polaris 20 |
Launch date | 15 Jun 2020 | 5 June 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 271 | 311 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1030 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Compute units | 40 | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 329.6 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.55 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.274 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2560 | 2304 |
Pixel fill rate | 65.92 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 164.8 GTexel/s | 193.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 150 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 6,175 gflops | |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Width | IGP | |
Length | 241 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 394.2 GB/s | 256.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2048 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 770 MHz (1540 MHz effective) | 6780 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |