AMD Radeon Pro 5600M vs AMD Radeon R9 390

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5600M and AMD Radeon R9 390 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon Pro 5600M

AMD Radeon R9 390

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 11 month(s) later
Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1030 MHz vs 1000 MHz
1030x more texture fill rate: 164.8 GTexel/s vs 160.0 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
5.5x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 275 Watt
Around 10% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 48379 vs 44112
Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9313 vs 8936

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	15 Jun 2020 vs 18 June 2015
Boost clock speed	1030 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Texture fill rate	164.8 GTexel/s vs 160.0 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt vs 275 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	48379 vs 44112
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715 vs 3708
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715 vs 3708
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3354 vs 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3354 vs 3353
PassMark - G3D Mark	9313 vs 8936

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 390

Around 30% higher memory clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 770 MHz (1540 MHz effective)
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10445 vs 10296
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10445 vs 10296
Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 800 vs 687

Specifications (specs)
Memory clock speed	1000 MHz vs 770 MHz (1540 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	10445 vs 10296
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	10445 vs 10296
PassMark - G2D Mark	800 vs 687

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 390

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

48379

44112

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

10296

10445

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

10296

10445

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

3708

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

3708

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3354

3353

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3354

3353

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

687

800

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

9313

8936

Name	AMD Radeon Pro 5600M	AMD Radeon R9 390
Geekbench - OpenCL	48379	44112
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	10296	10445
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	10296	10445
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715	3708
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715	3708
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3354	3353
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3354	3353
PassMark - G2D Mark	687	800
PassMark - G3D Mark	9313	8936
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		120.267
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		3164.164
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		11.097
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		116.473
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		607.381
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		3958

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro 5600M	AMD Radeon R9 390
Essentials
Architecture	RDNA 1.0	GCN 2.0
Code name	Navi 12	Grenada
Launch date	15 Jun 2020	18 June 2015
Place in performance rating	271	297
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Design		AMD Radeon R9 300 Series
Launch price (MSRP)		$329
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1030 MHz	1000 MHz
Compute units	40	40
Core clock speed	1000 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	329.6 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	10.55 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	5.274 TFLOPS
Pipelines	2560	2560
Pixel fill rate	65.92 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	164.8 GTexel/s	160.0 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt	275 Watt
Floating-point performance		5,120 gflops
Stream Processors		2560
Transistor count		6,200 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
Eyefinity
HDMI
Number of Eyefinity displays		6
VGA
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pin
Width	IGP
Bridgeless CrossFire
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
Length		275 mm
API support
DirectX	12.1	12
OpenCL	2.0	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.5
Vulkan
Mantle
Memory
High bandwidth memory (HBM)
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	8 GB
Memory bandwidth	394.2 GB/s	384 GB/s
Memory bus width	2048 bit	512 bit
Memory clock speed	770 MHz (1540 MHz effective)	1000 MHz
Memory type	HBM2	GDDR5
Technologies
AMD Eyefinity
CrossFire
DDMA audio
FreeSync
HD3D
HDMI 4K Support
LiquidVR
PowerTune
TrueAudio
Video Code Engine (VCE)
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)
ZeroCore