AMD Radeon Pro 5600M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5600M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon Pro 5600M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 0 month(s) later
936.4x more texture fill rate: 164.8 GTexel/s vs 176 billion / sec
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
5x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 250 Watt
Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
110x more memory clock speed: 770 MHz (1540 MHz effective) vs 7.0 GB/s
Around 29% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 48379 vs 37536
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3695
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3695

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	15 Jun 2020 vs 2 June 2015
Texture fill rate	164.8 GTexel/s vs 176 billion / sec
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt vs 250 Watt
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 6 GB
Memory clock speed	770 MHz (1540 MHz effective) vs 7.0 GB/s
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	48379 vs 37536
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715 vs 3695
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715 vs 3695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3354 vs 3338
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3354 vs 3338

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1075 MHz vs 1030 MHz
Around 10% higher pipelines: 2816 vs 2560
Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10471 vs 10296
Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10471 vs 10296
Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 854 vs 687
Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13811 vs 9313

Specifications (specs)
Boost clock speed	1075 MHz vs 1030 MHz
Pipelines	2816 vs 2560
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	10471 vs 10296
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	10471 vs 10296
PassMark - G2D Mark	854 vs 687
PassMark - G3D Mark	13811 vs 9313

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

48379

37536

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

10296

10471

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

10296

10471

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

3695

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

3695

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3354

3338

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3354

3338

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

687

854

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

9313

13811

Name	AMD Radeon Pro 5600M	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Geekbench - OpenCL	48379	37536
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	10296	10471
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	10296	10471
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715	3695
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715	3695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3354	3338
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3354	3338
PassMark - G2D Mark	687	854
PassMark - G3D Mark	9313	13811
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		145.843
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1722.98
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		11.661
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		37.16
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		788.464
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		5756

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro 5600M	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Essentials
Architecture	RDNA 1.0	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	Navi 12	GM200
Launch date	15 Jun 2020	2 June 2015
Place in performance rating	271	298
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$649
Price now		$679.99
Value for money (0-100)		23.43
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1030 MHz	1075 MHz
Compute units	40
Core clock speed	1000 MHz	1000 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	329.6 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	10.55 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	5.274 TFLOPS
Pipelines	2560	2816
Pixel fill rate	65.92 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	164.8 GTexel/s	176 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt	250 Watt
CUDA cores		2816
Floating-point performance		6,060 gflops
Transistor count		8,000 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
G-SYNC support
HDCP
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	6-pin + 8-pin
Width	IGP
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0
Height		4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length		10.5" (26.7 cm)
Recommended system power (PSU)		600 Watt
SLI options		4x
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.5
Vulkan
Memory
High bandwidth memory (HBM)
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	6 GB
Memory bandwidth	394.2 GB/s	336.5 GB / s
Memory bus width	2048 bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	770 MHz (1540 MHz effective)	7.0 GB/s
Memory type	HBM2	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Vision
Adaptive Vertical Sync
CUDA
GameStream
GameWorks
GeForce Experience
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost
SLI
Surround