AMD Radeon Pro 5600M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5600M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 42% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 705 MHz
- Around 18% higher boost clock speed: 1030 MHz vs 876 MHz
- 487.6x more texture fill rate: 164.8 GTexel/s vs 338 billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- 7.5x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 375 Watt
- 110x more memory clock speed: 770 MHz (1540 MHz effective) vs 7.0 GB/s
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 48379 vs 22732
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10296 vs 8124
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10296 vs 8124
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 2413
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 2413
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3354 vs 2226
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3354 vs 2226
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 687 vs 656
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9313 vs 8987
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 15 Jun 2020 vs 28 May 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 705 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1030 MHz vs 876 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 164.8 GTexel/s vs 338 billion / sec |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 375 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 770 MHz (1540 MHz effective) vs 7.0 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 48379 vs 22732 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10296 vs 8124 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10296 vs 8124 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 2413 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 2413 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 2226 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 2226 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 687 vs 656 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9313 vs 8987 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
- 2.3x more pipelines: 2x 2880 vs 2560
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
| Pipelines | 2x 2880 vs 2560 |
| Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro 5600M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 48379 | 22732 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10296 | 8124 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10296 | 8124 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 2413 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 2413 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 2226 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 2226 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 687 | 656 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9313 | 8987 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 66.419 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1261.593 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.89 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 17.882 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 309.857 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 17055 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro 5600M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Navi 12 | GK110B |
| Launch date | 15 Jun 2020 | 28 May 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 271 | 395 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,999 | |
| Price now | $1,580 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 6.46 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1030 MHz | 876 MHz |
| Compute units | 40 | |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 705 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 329.6 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.55 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.274 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 2x 2880 |
| Pixel fill rate | 65.92 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 164.8 GTexel/s | 338 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 375 Watt |
| CUDA cores | 5760 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 5,046 gflops | |
| Transistor count | 7,080 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | Two 8-pin |
| Width | IGP | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 394.2 GB/s | 672 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 2048 bit | 768-bit (384-bit per GPU) |
| Memory clock speed | 770 MHz (1540 MHz effective) | 7.0 GB/s |
| Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro 5600M with others
AMDRadeon Pro 5600M vs
AMDRadeon R9 M485X
AMDRadeon Pro 5600M vs
AMDRadeon RX 560X Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro 5600M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
AMDRadeon Pro 5600M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti
AMDRadeon Pro 5600M vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti
AMDRadeon Pro 5600M vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M
