AMD Radeon Pro 5600M vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5600M and NVIDIA Quadro M4000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon Pro 5600M

NVIDIA Quadro M4000M

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 9 month(s) later
Around 3% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 975 MHz
Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1030 MHz vs 1013 MHz
2112.8x more texture fill rate: 164.8 GTexel/s vs 78 GTexel / s
2x more pipelines: 2560 vs 1,280
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
2x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 100 Watt
2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 48379 vs 19089
Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10296 vs 7602
Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10296 vs 7602
Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 2749
Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 2749
Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3354 vs 3093
Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3354 vs 3093
Around 64% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 687 vs 419
Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9313 vs 6190

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	15 Jun 2020 vs 18 August 2015
Core clock speed	1000 MHz vs 975 MHz
Boost clock speed	1030 MHz vs 1013 MHz
Texture fill rate	164.8 GTexel/s vs 78 GTexel / s
Pipelines	2560 vs 1,280
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt vs 100 Watt
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	48379 vs 19089
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	10296 vs 7602
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	10296 vs 7602
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715 vs 2749
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715 vs 2749
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3354 vs 3093
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3354 vs 3093
PassMark - G2D Mark	687 vs 419
PassMark - G3D Mark	9313 vs 6190

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M

6.5x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 770 MHz (1540 MHz effective)

Memory clock speed	5012 MHz vs 770 MHz (1540 MHz effective)

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M4000M

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

48379

19089

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

10296

7602

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

10296

7602

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

2749

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

2749

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3354

3093

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3354

3093

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

687

419

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

9313

6190

Name	AMD Radeon Pro 5600M	NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
Geekbench - OpenCL	48379	19089
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	10296	7602
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	10296	7602
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715	2749
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715	2749
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3354	3093
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3354	3093
PassMark - G2D Mark	687	419
PassMark - G3D Mark	9313	6190
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		81.104
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1235.338
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		6.157
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		68.443
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		251.464
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		0

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro 5600M	NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
Essentials
Architecture	RDNA 1.0	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	Navi 12	GM204
Launch date	15 Jun 2020	18 August 2015
Place in performance rating	271	552
Type	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1030 MHz	1013 MHz
Compute units	40
Core clock speed	1000 MHz	975 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	329.6 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	10.55 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	5.274 TFLOPS
Pipelines	2560	1,280
Pixel fill rate	65.92 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	164.8 GTexel/s	78 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt	100 Watt
Floating-point performance		2,496 gflops
Transistor count		5,200 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port		1.2
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Width	IGP
Laptop size		large
API support
DirectX	12.1	12
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.5	5.0
Vulkan
Memory
High bandwidth memory (HBM)
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	394.2 GB/s	160 GB / s
Memory bus width	2048 bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	770 MHz (1540 MHz effective)	5012 MHz
Memory type	HBM2	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus