AMD Radeon Pro 560X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 560X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 560X

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• Around 26% higher core clock speed: 1004 MHz vs 797 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 100 Watt
• Around 2% higher memory clock speed: 5080 MHz vs 5000 MHz
• Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3678 vs 3594
• Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 711 vs 555
• Around 46% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17540 vs 12015
• Around 94% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 48.494 vs 24.986
• Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.96 vs 2.362
• Around 77% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 62.405 vs 35.269
• 4.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 247.728 vs 55.394

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition

• Around 31% higher pipelines: 1344 vs 1024
• Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 826.477 vs 679.583
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6030 vs 5367
• Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3657 vs 2495
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6030 vs 5367
• Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3657 vs 2495

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 560X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3678 3594
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	711 555
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	17540 12015
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	48.494 24.986
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	679.583 826.477
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.96 2.362
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	62.405 35.269
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	247.728 55.394
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5367 6030
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2495 3657
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3351 3347
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5367 6030
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2495 3657
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3351 3347

Compare specifications (specs)