AMD Radeon Pro 570 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 570 and AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 570
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 40% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 713 MHz
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1105 MHz vs 1086 MHz
- Around 36% higher memory clock speed: 6800 MHz vs 5000 MHz
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6337 vs 5582
- Around 18% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 30303 vs 25596
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.94 vs 6.025
- Around 75% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 436.958 vs 250.267
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7664 vs 5579
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2340 vs 1691
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 1565
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7664 vs 5579
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2340 vs 1691
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 1565
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 June 2017 vs 18 November 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 713 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1105 MHz vs 1086 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 6800 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6337 vs 5582 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 30303 vs 25596 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.94 vs 6.025 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 436.958 vs 250.267 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7664 vs 5579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2340 vs 1691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 1565 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7664 vs 5579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2340 vs 1691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 1565 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100
- Around 9% higher texture fill rate: 121.6 GTexel / s vs 112.0 GTexel / s
- Around 9% better floating-point performance: 3,892 gflops vs 3,584 gflops
- Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 120 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 778 vs 697
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 87.861 vs 74.958
- Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1362.14 vs 1070.209
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 106.141 vs 89.457
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 121.6 GTexel / s vs 112.0 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 3,892 gflops vs 3,584 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 120 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 778 vs 697 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 87.861 vs 74.958 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1362.14 vs 1070.209 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 106.141 vs 89.457 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 570
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 570 | AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6337 | 5582 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 697 | 778 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 30303 | 25596 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 74.958 | 87.861 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1070.209 | 1362.14 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.94 | 6.025 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 89.457 | 106.141 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 436.958 | 250.267 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7664 | 5579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2340 | 1691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 1565 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7664 | 5579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2340 | 1691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 1565 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 570 | AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Polaris 20 | Ellesmere |
Launch date | 5 June 2017 | 18 November 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 421 | 470 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
Price now | $349.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 19.34 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1105 MHz | 1086 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 713 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 3,584 gflops | 3,892 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 1792 | 1792 |
Texture fill rate | 112.0 GTexel / s | 121.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 5,700 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 217.6 GB / s | 160.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6800 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |