AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1499 MHz vs 1350 MHz
- 693.9x more texture fill rate: 239.8 GTexel/s vs 345.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 92% lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 816 vs 805
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16433 vs 13339
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16433 vs 13339
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 Aug 2020 vs 27 June 2017 |
Boost clock speed | 1499 MHz vs 1350 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 239.8 GTexel/s vs 345.6 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 816 vs 805 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16433 vs 13339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16433 vs 13339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 vs 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 vs 3709 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 1243 MHz
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 2560
- Around 5% higher memory clock speed: 1572 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12984 vs 12613
- Around 20% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 71540 vs 59733
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1250 MHz vs 1243 MHz |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 2560 |
Memory clock speed | 1572 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12984 vs 12613 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 71540 vs 59733 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 816 | 805 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12613 | 12984 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 59733 | 71540 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16433 | 13339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16433 | 13339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 | 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 | 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3353 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 142.691 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1729.558 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.693 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 111.376 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1396.172 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | Navi 10 | Vega 10 |
Launch date | 4 Aug 2020 | 27 June 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 173 | 226 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1499 MHz | 1350 MHz |
Compute units | 40 | |
Core clock speed | 1243 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 479.7 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.35 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.675 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2560 | 4096 |
Pixel fill rate | 95.94 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 239.8 GTexel/s | 345.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 10300 million | 12,500 million |
Floating-point performance | 11,059 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Width | IGP | |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 384 GB/s | 402.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 2048 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 1572 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |