AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 4 Aug 2020 vs 22 February 2019 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 816 vs 813 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Around 21% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1243 MHz
- Around 18% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1499 MHz
- Around 8% lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 130 Watt
- 8x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12930 vs 12613
- Around 3% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 61407 vs 59733
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16952 vs 16433
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16952 vs 16433
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1243 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz vs 1499 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 130 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12930 vs 12613 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 61407 vs 59733 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16952 vs 16433 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16952 vs 16433 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3712 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3712 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3353 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 816 | 813 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12613 | 12930 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 59733 | 61407 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16433 | 16952 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16433 | 16952 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3355 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 208.608 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2573.643 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.447 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 145.886 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 926.614 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6260 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
| Code name | Navi 10 | TU116 |
| Launch date | 4 Aug 2020 | 22 February 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 173 | 200 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $279 | |
| Price now | $279.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 67.32 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1499 MHz | 1770 MHz |
| Compute units | 40 | |
| Core clock speed | 1243 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 479.7 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.35 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.675 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 95.94 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 239.8 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 120 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10300 million | 6,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Width | IGP | |
| Length | 229 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 384 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 12000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT with others
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 XT vs
AMDRadeon R9 295X2
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 XT vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 XT vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 64X
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 XT vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 XT vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 XT vs
IntelArc A730M
