AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 24% higher core clock speed: 1243 MHz vs 1005 MHz
- Around 8% higher texture fill rate: 239.8 GTexel/s vs 222.5 GTexel/s
- Around 11% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 2304
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 23% lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 160 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
Launch date | 4 Aug 2020 vs 13 November 2018 |
Core clock speed | 1243 MHz vs 1005 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 239.8 GTexel/s vs 222.5 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 2304 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt vs 160 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
- Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 1499 MHz
- Around 8% higher memory clock speed: 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
- Around 43% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 85559 vs 59733
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20206 vs 16433
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20206 vs 16433
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz vs 1499 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 85559 vs 59733 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 vs 16433 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 vs 16433 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 3712 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 3712 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3353 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 816 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12613 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 59733 | 85559 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16433 | 20206 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16433 | 20206 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3359 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 282.628 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3403.106 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.719 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.919 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1010.818 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7856 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
Code name | Navi 10 | TU104 |
Launch date | 4 Aug 2020 | 13 November 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 173 | 195 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
GCN generation | Quadro RTX | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $899 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1499 MHz | 1545 MHz |
Compute units | 40 | |
Core clock speed | 1243 MHz | 1005 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 479.7 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.35 TFLOPS (2:1) | 14.24 TFLOPS |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.675 TFLOPS | 7.119 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 2560 | 2304 |
Pixel fill rate | 95.94 GPixel/s | 98.88 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 239.8 GTexel/s | 222.5 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 160 Watt |
Transistor count | 10300 million | 13600 million |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 222.5 GFLOPS | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Width | IGP | |
Length | 9.5 inches (241 mm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 384 GB/s | 416.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |