AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 29% higher core clock speed: 1243 MHz vs 780 - 960 MHz
- Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1499 MHz vs 1380 - 1485 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 816 vs 566
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 Aug 2020 vs 27 May 2019 |
Core clock speed | 1243 MHz vs 780 - 960 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1499 MHz vs 1380 - 1485 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 816 vs 566 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
- Around 63% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 130 Watt
- 9.3x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12794 vs 12613
- Around 15% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 68858 vs 59733
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 18169 vs 16433
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 18169 vs 16433
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 130 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12794 vs 12613 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 68858 vs 59733 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18169 vs 16433 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18169 vs 16433 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3712 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3712 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3353 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 816 | 566 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12613 | 12794 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 59733 | 68858 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16433 | 18169 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16433 | 18169 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3359 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
Code name | Navi 10 | N19E-Q3 MAX-Q |
Launch date | 4 Aug 2020 | 27 May 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 173 | 181 |
Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1499 MHz | 1380 - 1485 MHz |
Compute units | 40 | |
Core clock speed | 1243 MHz | 780 - 960 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 479.7 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.35 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.675 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2560 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 95.94 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 239.8 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 80 Watt |
Transistor count | 10300 million | 13600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Width | IGP | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 384 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
VR Ready |